Greg MD Blog

Thoughts:

What is the meaning of “America must be kept American?” Looking at our 2016 movement presidential campaign’s big push on illegal immigrants is wanting to come to America. The issue of concern within the Republican and Democratic party is that white is becoming minorities in the future. Because of the influx of non-whites, they used this as the first “America for the Americans.” We can look at this both ways: are we, as Americans, here to help others from other counties? Or are we looking at this selfishly by putting ourselves first?

Compared to the 2016 and 1924 presidential administrations, there is not much difference other than the year when these issues are happing. Both administrations exercised discriminatory “unpinning.” The immigration laws only allow certain groups by color to eliminate and restrict, for example, “Chines and Japanese” from entering our country, which is based on race, culture, and ethnicity. Looking at the pattern from the 1924 Immigration act with the Coolidge bill would prevent immigrants from setting quotas to many populations based on their nationality.

Most foreigners see America as an opportunity for life, freedom, and wealth. But what is the cost to American citizens when we allow foreigners to become U.S. citizens? As Americans, we waste so many resources in creating an environment within an environment. Do we open barriers to allow a gain for the inexpensive worker for the affluent to use for an enormous profit, affecting the American people who are suffering a lot in finding work? Many factors can contribute to the U.S. worker losing jobs. The white population feels as if they are homogeneous since the birth rate is declining. Because of the decline of white people, the movement in 2016 pushed for and banding of certain nationalists by controlling non-white groups. These mixtures consist of race to suppress the “freedom of speech and the press.”

“America for the American” is based on our U.S. Constitution. One of the differences between 2016 and 1924 is that we have technology that can immodestly spread worldwide information to the public. We say that select groups or populations have a ” Clamor ” quota law. Within that law, we are limiting certain groups; however, within those groups, we have set up testing to accept the best out of that group. Is this a way to manipulate immigration law without saying we don’t want you here based on your race, ethnicity, or nationality? These illegal entries are “systematized” to enforce our current laws of immigration. The development of unrestrained proliferation is the right of all Americans. The existing law on immigration is limited and needs changes that protect individual rights, whether legal or illegal. To respect all people’s rights and dignity. Regardless of their background, race, or nationality.

Written by: Greg MD